Skip to content
Moosewave
Demo
Menu

TransactionalReview & approval

Code review requested email template

A change proposed for review with the reviewer's job made clear.

See the full preview Use it with MCP

Illustrative example. Replace the fictional sender, dates, amounts, locations, and account details before use.

Responsive design preview

See the message before you make it yours.

Compare the desktop and mobile compositions, or unfold the full design. The complete starting copy remains readable below.

Code review requestedIllustrative preview
Code review requested email template preview

The complete design fits in this window.

Auto follows your screen width. The complete design is visible in this window.

A reviewed browser rendition of the code review requested structure. It is not a send receipt or an inbox-placement claim.

Want to change the copy and style?

Try one of the editable browser templates.

This page is a read-only reference. The five hands-on studios let you edit a local preview, compare desktop and mobile, and review every change before continuing.

See editable templates

Message anatomy

A useful starting point, with the important parts named.

Two of the three files are mechanical. The migration is not reversible in production, which is where the attention is worth spending.

What you can change

  • Brand name
  • Subject line
  • Preheader
  • Eyebrow
  • Headline
  • Supporting copy
  • Primary action label
  • Primary action URL

What to keep clear

  1. State or event context
  2. Plain-language explanation
  3. Three labelled facts
  4. Primary and secondary action
  5. Support or privacy footer

Complete starting copy

Read it as text, not only as a picture.

Sample details are fictional. Replace them with reviewed customer and event data before use.
From
Doynton Reviews
Subject
Review this, and here is what to look for
Preheader
Three files. The risky one is the migration.

Review requested

Three files, and the migration is the one to read carefully

Two of the three files are mechanical. The migration is not reversible in production, which is where the attention is worth spending.

Files changed

3

Read carefully

The migration

Tests added

6

Open the reviewAsk a question on it
If the migration looks wrong, say so plainly. A blocked review is much cheaper than an irreversible migration.

Moosewave MCP

Give an agent the structure, the job, and a stopping point.

A compatible MCP app can inspect this reference and create a separate workspace draft when it has permission. The brief cannot send.

The brief asks for a new draft and stops before send.

Read the complete brief

Connected work

Take the design beyond the canvas.

Transactional email APIConnect the message to a real product event and keep its outcome visible.IntegrationsCarry the right customer and event context into the draft.SecurityKeep account, access, and recovery boundaries explicit.MCP for agentsAdapt presentation without quietly changing the event being explained.

Keep exploring

Browse all 1405