The first four issues are poor and they are staying up
What was wrong with them
Too confident, too few sources, and written from things I half remembered rather than things I had checked.
What changed
A reader corrected me in issue five, publicly and correctly. Everything since has been more carefully sourced and less certain.
Why keep them
Because an archive that only contains the good work is a portfolio rather than a record. The correction in issue five is the useful part.
